![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
rocky,
Yes, the Lord teaches through similitudes and parables and metaphors as He says in Hosea. However, He is not the author of confusion. Most often, scripture will define the metaphor somewhere else or in a combination of places, or in the entire contexts of the word usage. Do you not understand that? In our world, in our culture, the English word "oil" which can mean many things that are oily in texture, which includes both olive oil and crude oil. They are not the same thing at all however. And the Word makes it VERY clear that the meaning of oil used in Rev is olive oil. Now, speaking of metaphors, it is also very clear throughout scripture that the oil is a symbol, or metaphor for the Holy Spirit. God created olive oil. God also uses it as a metaphor, pictures of the properties of the Holy Spirit. If you go back and read all the places where oil is used in scripture, you see a beautifully interwoven picture of the Holy Spirit - His personality, and His work in our lives. His oil burns bright and soft and without pollution. Compare that to crude, dirty, black oil that you are speaking of. Just this thread existing shows how its properties are disgusting. Go and read all the verses where oil is used in scripture and then come back and say that it is talking about crude oil. You cannot say that God uses a certain word to symbolize one thing here and something else there. Again, He is not the author of confusion! If you were to substitue crude oil in all those same verses, you would get a complete mess. Yes, scripture is indeed full of metaphors, similitudes, etc. Probably way beyond our means to understand (that is why we need the Holy Spirit - not crude oil - to shed light on scripture to our heart when we read it). In Jesus alone, Andra |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Andra:
Back in those days they used the elaion (the oil) to feed the lamps. So crude 'feeds the lamps' in our day in time. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmE29pCR5gg I have offered a perspective in the book of Revelation in which we live in the Laodicean church age and in the time of the black horseman. But the Laodicean church age and the black horseman 'run together' with the other six church ages and the other two horseman. I have made this a very clear presentation. If you would like to put something similar together yourself I would give it audience. I think it comes to the point where you either agree or disagree. In which, it is not conditional to salvation to understand the similitudes and mysteries of Revelations. I would also think that if we had 1,000 sincere bible scholars of the same church denomination write their interpretations of this prophecy that no two of them would be quite the same. Last edited by rockytopva : 07-30-2010 at 07:58 PM. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
rocky,
You said: Back in those days they used the elaion (the oil) to feed the lamps. So crude 'feeds the lamps' in our day in time. Your proof of this? And please do not say it comes from Isaac Newton. We have been down that road before that he was not a believer. In fact, quite the opposite since he very clearly denied that Jesus was God. From Easton's dictionary under the heading of oil: Quote:
Quote:
I am not going to go down a road where the Lord does not lead. I am not talking at all about your theories (well, I did question the ones that came from Newton previously). I am merely trying to point out the hermenutical error in saying that the oil in Rev 6:6 is referring to crude oil when all solid herenutical clues point to it being olive oil. Scripture is not there for our private interpretation. It does not matter at all what the change from crude oil to olive oil does to your theory. I think it comes to the point where you either agree or disagree. In which, it is not conditional to salvation to understand the similitudes and mysteries of Revelations. I would also think that if we had 1,000 sincere bible scholars of the same church denomination write their interpretations of this prophecy that no two of them would be quite the same. It is not about agreeing or disagreeing to your theory. It is about improper use of seeing that as oil. I do not hestitate at all to think that all your bible scholars, if they were truly bible scholars would almost all agree is talking about oil in the same way the Word has been using it all along. You may want to do some reading on what different kind hermenutics are out there. If so, you would find that "bible scholars" from the same denomination would all be using the same type and would not have all the different interpretations. The best reason for all the different interpretations is simply that the Lord still has the veils over our eyes for these future events. Only by relying on His grace to reveal His truths in His time and His way will we understand. Otherwise, we are the ships tossed in James 1. No, this is not a salvation issue (although the Newton issue IS a salvation issue), but it is an issue of the proper way to interpret scripture. Most common and most correct is the grammatical-historical method. Otherwise, people would come up with quite bizarre ways of interpreting - like the use of crude oil where it is talking about olive oil and all the biblical metaphors associated with it (look up some of the above references). More oil dictionary entries below: (These are from standard bible references, ones that any biblical scholar would have or have access to) In Jesus alone, Andra |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Notice that the Greek Word elaion does in fact mean olive oil:
From "International Standard Bible Encyclopedia" Quote:
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
From American Tract Society Dictionary
Quote:
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
From Smith's Bible Dictionary:
Quote:
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hermeneutics are interesting. The most studied scholars of the Old Testament couldn't agree on even the most fundamental of truths, let alone recognize their Messiah as He stood before them in flesh.
I don't suggest that we don't study the Bible, or even that language, culture, and history can't help in that endeavor. I suggest that the single most important factor in understanding His Word is His Holy Spirit of Truth, and His Word bears that simple fact out repeatedly. It's a rabbit hole that arrogance can draw one who assumes that "shew thyself approved" means to spend most of their time in fleshly attempts to figure out text. We should lean far more on Him than we do on our own worldly attempt to understand His plan for us. |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
What were we all worried about, you ask?
A few pelicans? There were thousands, along with most the sea life of the gulf. Not to mention the lively hoods of so many fishermen. But it's not going to stop here. The oil is NOT gone, regardless of what you are hearing in the news. They just sunk it with the use of dispursants. You can't just say, ABRACADABRA, and it disappears. The media has lied more in this situation than any other story I've ever observed. And it is anything but over. Dead fish are washing up by the thousands on many shores. And the long term affects of people on the gulf is only yet to be determined. The EPA hasn't even been testing the rainwater that has been falling on the gulf. There has been a massive coverup from BP and our own government. NOAA has been conducting "sniff tests" of the fish to see if the fish are safe or not. If it doesn't smell like oil, they mark it on the chart that it's not contaminated. This test is like something from the Flinstones age. And it doesn't even show what chemicals are in those fish from the deadly dispursants that were used. It's a total joke. Let's not become sheeple with our heads in the sand. And never start believing all your told by the corporate owned news media stations. The Weather Channel and MSNBC have been 2 of the worst in the coverup.
__________________
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Chayah ""A woman's heart should be so lost in God that a man needs to seek Him in order to find her!" ![]() . Last edited by Chayah : 08-12-2010 at 12:54 PM. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|